I sometimes see threads come through that deal with discrepancies noted by a
Laboratory, Agency or some other reviewing entity. Typically the person with
the question has been told that there is a problem but not a reference for
this problem.
As a Safety Engineer (you EMC guys can split now) in a Laboratory, I would
never write a crit letter unless I indicate the paragraph associated with
the discrepancy. This allows the customer to look up the particular
requirement and formulate a fix or a good arguement why not.
I am an old timer who had two very good mentors in his career (John Bertalan
from Xerox and George Jurasich from TUV Rheinland) that beat this into me,
but I get the feeling that the pro's have gotten away from this.
Scott Barrows
Senior Product Safety Engineer
KTL Dallas
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
