Paolo,
        Thank you for the information. I suspect that you are correct as to
the critical nature of the frequency modulation method. The design engineer
picked the device, probably as the cheapest vendor. The device did not
behave as I expected, based on some Internet research of dithered clock
technology. We were very pressed for time, but I hope someday to spend some
more looking at this technology. Perhaps my experience explains the digital
TV set interference, since all such devices are obviously not the same.

        Scott Lacey

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
[SMTP:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it]
        Sent:   Monday, March 20, 2000 5:21 AM
        To:     emc-p...@ieee.org
        Subject:        RE: Dithered clocks and EMC - BEWARE


        I have a very succesfull experience with SSCG (Spread Spectrum Clock
Generation) that  is  a  patented  technology  used  to  intentionally
spread the energy of oscillators  and  clock signals and any signal derived
from the clock. I am sure Keith Hardin knows it first-hand because he is one
of the developers !  We  have  been  using  an SSCG chip since 1995 on most
of the electronics of our printers  -  most  of  them  class B devices, with
oscillator frequencies in the range  24  -  32  MHz.   We   even managed to
get significant cost reductions by switching from 4-layer to 2-layer boards
and still passing CISPR22 and FCC class B limits for radiated emissions.
        One  point  that  seems  not  to  have come up in this discussion is
the kind of dithering we are talking about.
        In SSCG the main clock frequency is modulated, but just ANY
frequency modulation is  not  enough  ! Key is the wave-shape of the
modulating function, and that is the  crucial  point  in  the  SSCG  patent
(Keith, correct me if I'm wrong). The "trick"  is  to  maximize  the  rate
of change of the function representing the frequency  modulation,  so  that
the  oscillator spends the minimum time on any given  frequency  within the
modulating range, thus avoiding additional peaks in the  emission  spectrum.
The modulating function in the SSCG technique does just that.
        This is best explained in the first (to my knowledge) publication on
the subject (here, too, Keith knows much more !!) :
        K.B.Hardin,  J.T.Fessler,  D.R.Bush  (Lexmark  Intl.):  "Spread
Spectrum  Clock Generation  for  the  Reduction  of  Radiated  Emissions"
-   1994  IEEE Intl.  Symposium on EMC, August 1994 Chicago (Symposium
Record page 227)
        I  suspect  an explanation to Scott's problem may be that he didn't
use the SSCG technique  but  another form of  dithering that was not
controlled in such a way as  to  get  the  flat  frequency distribution that
you get with SSCG.  Also the amount  of  frequency  deviation  can  be
important. The attenuation you get in quasi-peak  (QP)  readings  is
dependent on that. I hope Scott can give us more details.
        As  to  the  problems with digital TV, I honestly don't have any
knowledge about that,  but  I  remember  the  same inventors of SSCG did a
study on interference potential of this technique :
        K.B.Hardin,   J.T.Fessler,   D.R.Bush   (Lexmark  Intl.):   "  A
Study  of  the Interference  Potential  of  Spread Spectrum Clock Generation
Techniques" - 1995 IEEE Intl. Symposium on EMC Atlanta ( Symposium Record
page 624).
        Hope this helps.
        Paolo Roncone
        Compuprint s.p.a. - Italy



        -------------------------------------------
        This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical
Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
             majord...@ieee.org <mailto:majord...@ieee.org>  with the single
line:
             unsubscribe emc-pstc
        For help, send mail to the list administrators:
             Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
<mailto:jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com> 
             Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
<mailto:pstc_ad...@garretson.org> 

        For policy questions, send mail to:
             Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org <mailto:ri...@ieee.org> 
        

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org

Reply via email to