AND PREFERABLY IN ENGLISH!!
     
     Tony Reynolds
     Pitney Bowes Ltd


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: CENELEC Central Secretariat enquiry on LVD standards and
Author:  "Scott Douglas" <[email protected]> at smtpgwy
List-Post: [email protected]
Date:    14/03/00 11:13


     
Richard,
     
Can you or someone else please put this in layperson's terms?
     
Scott
[email protected]
ECRM Incorporated
Tewksbury, MA  USA
     
     
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:46 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: CENELEC Central Secretariat enquiry on LVD standards and thei r 
l ink to the R&TT
Importance: Low
     
     
FYI. Richard Woods
     
     
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  [ 
mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] 
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2000 1:20 PM
To: "NC_all"@cenelec.be <mailto:>
Cc: "PD_all"@cenelec.be; <mailto:>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];> 
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected]; <mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>  [email protected]; 
<mailto:[email protected];>
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Central Secretariat enquiry on LVD standards and their link to 
the R&TTE Directive
     
     
This message is addressed to all National Committees
with cc to all Permanent Delegates, the Chairmen and Secretaries of CLC/TC 
74,
TC 76, TC 79, TC 92, TC 209 and the Reporting Secretariat of IEC/TC 103.
     
     
Dear Madam, dear Sir,
     
On 2000-03-02 an informal EC/CENELEC/ETSI meeting was held concerning the 
R&TTE
Directive (R&TTED) and its relation to the LVD and the EMC Directive 
(EMCD).
     
     
The outcome of this meeting was considered as document BT(Bxl/SG)1087 
(attached)
by 103 BT which led to the following decisions:
     
D103/181  BT noted the outcome of the EC/CENELEC/ETSI information meeting 
of
     
        2000-03-02, concerning the R&TTE Directive and its relation to the
LVD
        and the EMC Directive.
     
D103/182  BT invited CS to arrange a procedure in writing (with deadline
        2000-03-31) on the suitability of the identified standards from TC
74,
        TC 76, TC 92, TC 209 and SR 103 as harmonised standards under the
R&TTE
        Directive (for products falling outside the LVD scope) in view of 
        subsequent information towards the Commission.
     
You will read that, as there are no specific requirements for the R&TTED, 
additional to the LVD, this means that the LVD standards will be "taken 
over" by
the R&TTED (by means of a reference in the OJEC). There are however two 
issues
linked to the R&TTED and this in the voltage range 0 V to 50 V AC/75 V DC 
(outside the LVD scope) i.e.:
     
   the use of the existing LVD standards in this range as harmonised
standard
   under the R&TTED
   the possible preparation (following a future mandate) of some specific 
   harmonised standards (e.g. for alarm systems) for the R&TTE Directive
     
This Central Secretariat enquiry, in accordance with D103/182, deals with 
the
first type of standards.
     
>From the report on the EC/CENELEC/ETSI meeting and the subsequent 103 BT 
decisions, you will understand that it is of utmost importance for CENELEC 
to
send a confirmation to the EC that identified standards, listed under the 
LVD
can also be used under the R&TTED, including for the lower voltage range.
     
Together with ETSI and after consultation with the Chairmen/Secretaries of 
the
relevant CENELEC technical bodies, we have identified following standards 
which
would fall into this context:
     
    EN  60950  "Safety of information technology equipment, including
electrical
             business equipment"
    EN   60065   "Audio,   video   and   similar  electronic  apparatus:
Safety
             requirements"
    EN 60825 "Safety of laser products"
             "Part 1: Equipment classification, requirements and user's
guide"
             "Part 2: Safety of optical fibre communications systems"
    EN  41003  "Particular  safety requirements for equipment to be
connected to
             telecommunications networks"
    EN 60215 "Safety requirements for radio transmitting equipment"
    EN  50083-1  "Cabled  distribution systems for television and sound
signals.
             Part 1: Safety requirements"
     
Unless advice to the contrary from your side by 2000-03-31 at the latest, 
we
     
shall inform the Commission that these standards can also be used for the 
R&TTED
in the lower voltage range.
     
Yours faithfully,
     
J.-P. Vetsuypens
Division Manager
Programming and technical co-ordination
     
(See attached file: 553bxl1087.doc)
     
     
 <<Lotus Manuscript 1.0>>
     
     
     
     
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety 
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
     
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc
     
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected] 
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     
For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     
     
     


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to