Hallo Günter J. Maass,

a simple question, did you ever get any answer?

As far as I read the standard it is not written if the limits are peak or
rms. But it is written that the limits are applicable to equipment intended
to be conencted to 220/380 V, 230/400 V and 240/415 V. Written without rms.
This is to me an indication that too the limits are in rms.

The limits for Class C equipment are given in percentage of the input
current at the fundamental frequency. To me it would be most logical if the
limits are rms values, if/when/as the input current at the fundamental
frequency is given in rms.

EN 61000-3-2 § 6.2.2 says: "......However, for transitory even harmonic
currents of order from 2 to 10 and transitory odd harmonic currents of order
from 3 to 19, values up to 1,5 times the limits in tables 1 to 3 are allowed
for each harmonic during a maximum of 10 % of any observation period of 2,5
min."
I think this is a kind of taking care of occasional peak currents.

Venlig hilsen/Regards

Niels Hougaard
EMC Engineer, B.Sc.E.E
BARCO AS/Communication Systems
Phone direct: +45 39170815
Fax: +45 39170010
Mailto:[email protected]
www.barco.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: 24. februar 2000 15:26
> To:   [email protected]
> Subject:      Current limits EN61000-3-2
> 
> 
> People
> 
> A short and simple question...
> Are the current limits for harmonics given by the EN61000-3-2, PEAK or RMS
> values ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Günter J. Maass
> Product Researcher
> Embraco S.A. - Brazil
> 

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to