Scott,

The product I'm currently looking at uses a 2 -prong AC mains plug.  Actually
the supply is small direct plug-in type with DC leads that connect to the
product.  The product itself is encased in plastic and the only other connection
is through an internal modem board to a standard analog telephone line.  The
connection to the phone line is a simple 2-wire (tip and ring) configuration.
As I see it, surge tests with reference to earth ground are pointless.

Others have pointed out that an "ungrounded" product may in the real world
actually have a reference to ground depending on how it is installed or what
other equipment it is connected to.   That is a good point which I hadn't
thought about.  However, I don't think that in my particular situation that's
that case.

Thanks to all who responded with their opinions.

Jim





"Lacey,Scott" <[email protected]> on 03/01/2000 01:31:46 PM

Please respond to "Lacey,Scott" <[email protected]>

To:   "'Jim Hulbert'" <[email protected]>
cc:   "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> (bcc: Jim Hulbert/MSD/US/PBI)

Subject:  RE: Surge Testing per EN 55024/EN61000-4-5





Jim,
I'm not quite sure from the description what your product looks like, but,
here are a few things to keep in mind. If you use a 3-prong ac mains plug
you absolutely should do the line-to-ground test. If you use a 2-prong ac
mains plug you still might want to perform the test anyway, depending on how
your product is used. For example, if your plastic housing may be DIN rail
mounted or screwed to a wall, you may have a leakage or arc path to earth.
Your customer may have deliberately grounded the DIN rail to satisfy the
requirements of other vendor's equipment already mounted. Even if it only
gets screwed to a plasterboard wall, it still may get grounded by accident.
I have seen two such scenarios over the years. In the first instance one
mounting screw went through the wallboard and touched the grounded sheath of
a BX cable in an older building. In the second instance a screw penetrated a
metal stud used to frame the wall. An outlet box was attached to another
stud. Bingo - instant ground.

I'm sure there are many who will disagree with me, but we test products not
only to conform to a standard, but also to ensure a more robust product. I
want to find any vulnerability first, before the product gets to a customer.
Customers tend to get VERY angry when their new product "hiccups", and the
nasty stuff tends to flow downhill real fast when their CEO calls yours.

Scott Lacey

     -----Original Message-----
     From:     Jim Hulbert [SMTP:[email protected]]
     Sent:     Wednesday, March 01, 2000 10:32 AM
     To:  [email protected]
     Subject:  Surge Testing per EN 55024/EN61000-4-5




     Colleagues,

     EN 55024 calls for surge pulses to be applied line-to-line and
line-to-earth on
     the AC mains port and line-to-ground on signal and
telecommunications ports that
     connect directly to outdoor cables.   However, if my EUT is encased
in plastic
     covers and has no direct earth ground connection (class 2 power
supply), is the
     line-to-line test on the AC mains the only surge test that I need to
apply?   It
     seems to me that performing a line-to-earth test on either the AC
mains port or
     on signal/telecommunications ports is not warranted since the basic
standard EN
     61000-4-5 does not specify placing the EUT over a reference ground
plane.   With
     no reference ground plane and no direct ground connection how can a
test be
     applied with respect to ground?

     Jim Hulbert
     Pitney Bowes



     ---------
     This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
     Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

     To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
          [email protected]
     with the single line:
          unsubscribe emc-pstc

     For help, send mail to the list adminstrators:
          Jim Bacher:              [email protected], or
          Michael Garretson:    [email protected]
     For policy questions, send mail to:
          Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]









-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to