Chris,

I am by no means an expert here as I have only been doing compliance about 2
years. Most of my experience is in I.T.E. i.e. UL 1950, IEC 950, etc. We
have just recently started doing products that are tested under UL 3111-1,
EN6101-1, IEC 1010-1, etc. I am basically going by what the standards say
and what has been my personal experience. 

In my copy of IEC 1010-1 it only lists two different pollution degrees, 1
and 2. 

3.7.2 POLLUTION: Any addition of foreign matter, solid, liquid or gaseous
(ionized gases), that may produce a reduction of dielectric strength or
surface resistivity.

3.7.3 POLLUTION DEGREE: For the purpose of evaluating CLEARANCES the
following two degrees of POLLUTION in the micro-environment are recognized
for use with this part 1.

3. 7.3.1 POLLUTION DEGREE 1: No POLLUTION or only dry, non-conductive
POLLUTION occurs. The POLLUTION has no influence. 

3.7.3.2 POLLUTION DEGREE 2: Normally only non-conductive POLLUTION occurs.
Occasionally, however, a temporary conductivity caused by condensation must
be expected.

Now here is where the I.T.E. standards differ from the test equipment
standards. In UL 1950, EN60950, etc. there are three degrees of pollution. 

First of all here is what the workbook that I received at a UL 1950 seminar
held by UL in 1998 has to say:

Pollution Degree 1: No pollution. Hermetically sealed
Pollution Degree 2: Nonconductive Pollution. Might become temporarily
conductive because of condensation.
Pollution Degree 3: Conductive Pollution OR Nonconductive Pollution which
could become conductive due to expected condensation.

>From EN 60950:

2.9.1 The values for Pollution Degree 1 are applicable to components and
assemblies which are sealed so as to exclude dust and moisture (see 2.9.6)

The values for Pollution Degree 2 are generally applicable to equipment
covered by the scope of this standard.

The values for Pollution Degree 3 are applicable where a local internal
environment within the equipment is subject to conductive pollution or to
dry non-conductive pollution which could become conductive due to expected
condensation.

2.9.6 Enclosed and Sealed Parts  
For components or subassemblies which are adequately enclosed by enveloping
or hermetic sealing to prevent ingress of dirt and moisture, the values for
Pollution Degree 1 apply to internal CLEARANCES and CREEPAGE DISTANCES.


In looking at these standards it appears that the definitions for 1 and 2
align pretty closely. The Pollution Degree 3 in the 1950 standards does not
appear to have an equivalent in the 1010 standards. (Maybe I.T.E. can be
used in a more polluted environment than test equipment).

We always do our PC boards based on Pollution Degree 2. For internal layers
you can use Pollution Degree 1.

Also in the UL 1950 workbook from the UL seminar it specifically states
"Office Environment-Pollution Degree 2" It also states that it us necessary
to consider the amount of pollution in a given environment when coordinating
insulation. - macro environments  -- micro environments. It shows as an
example a copier. The entire copier is in a Pollution Degree 2 environment.
There is a High Voltage Power Supply within the copier that is encapsulated
in epoxy. The environment inside this Power Supply is Pollution Degree 1. It
shows that in the area of the Toner Cartridge that it is Pollution Degree 3.


So I would say that for most things for an indoor environment you should use
Pollution Degree 2.

Kurt Andrews
Compliance Engineer
Tracewell Systems, Inc.
567 Enterprise Dr.
Westerville, OH 43081
Ph. 614-846-6175
Fax 614-846-7791
Email: [email protected] 

        -----Original Message-----
        From:   Chris Wells [SMTP:[email protected]]
        Sent:   Sunday, January 16, 2000 8:00 AM
        To:     'emc-pstc'
        Subject:        pollution degree 1? 2?


        Kurt 
        In your feedback (thank you!) you state that pollution degree 1 is
for conditions with NO pollution at all like a potted epoxy environment.
This is the impression I got from UL and other sources.  
        Help me out here please.  
        From my memory the definition in EN61010-1 (same as in IEC 664)
        Pollution degree 1 is for non conductive dust environments - no
condensation.
        Pollution degree 2 is for non conductive dust environments -
occasional condensation
        Pollution degree 3 is for conductive dust environments.

        The definition for pollution degree 1 implies that this is a
standard office like environment.
        Am I missing something here?
        Do most PCB spacings get evaluated to pollution degree 2?
        in ITE?
        in Automation equipment like Programmable Logic Controllers ?

        Thanks .

        Chris Wells
        Senior Design Eng
        Cutler-Hammer
        Pittsburgh Pa
        [email protected]

        Original Message-----
                        From: Andrews, Kurt [mailto:[email protected]]
                        Sent: Monday, January 10, 2000 12:14 PM
                        To: Price, Ed; '[email protected]'
                        Cc: 'Chris Wells'
                        Subject: RE: Pollution degree help



                        Ed, Chris,

                        Normally Pollution Degree 1 is used for items that
receive no pollution at
                        all. These are hermetically sealed or
potted/encapsulated parts. However you
                        can use pollution degree 1 for internal PCB layers.
<snip>

        ---------
        This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
        To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
        with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
        quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
        [email protected], [email protected], or
        [email protected] (the list administrators).
        

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to [email protected]
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], or
[email protected] (the list administrators).

Reply via email to