Forwarded for Bert Planting.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Laser Safety
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:59:41 +0200
From: Bert Planting <[email protected]>
Organization: ASML
To: Matt Kilkenny <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
References: <[email protected]>
Matt,
Because you are using a microprocessor limitating it this is not seen as
sufficient safe solution for reduction of the output by "safety" people
(based on my experience with US third parties).
Reduction should only be done by hardware and not by fault sensitive
microprocessor.
In this case you should use an interlock.
regards,
Bert Planting
Prodct safety ASML
Matt Kilkenny wrote:
>
> I have a question on lasers for ITE concerning IEC-825 and FDA requirements.
> According to IEC, class 3b lasers have to have safety doors (interlocks).
> Can automatic power reduction be used if you are not pumping the laser to a
> 3b class level of power. In other words, can we not put interlocks on the
> system if the 3b laser power has been reduced to a 3a or class 1 level
> through microprocessor limitating it? Or is their single fault concerns if
> the microprocessor fails?
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Matt Kilkenny
> [email protected]
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
Dave Heald [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
