David

You are correct.  If the worst case configurations (they may be different
for emission and immunity) are demonstrated to be compliant by meeting the
requirements of the harmonised standards, you can also place the other
variants on the market.  Your declaration of conformity should cover all the
variants.

You should document your reasons for the selection of the variant(s) you
have tested, and keep it in your files, in case there is a challenge by
enforcement authorities in the future.

Best wishes

Brian Jones
EMC Consultant and Competent Body Signatory


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Gelfand <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 1:42 PM
> Subject: Do we need a competent body?
>
>
> >
> > We manufacture IT equipment with no radio interfaces.  Our system is
> similar to
> > a PC, host motherboards can accept various i/o cards.
> >
> > There are two different opinions regarding competent bodies.
> >
> > Mine:  Our equipment falls within the scope of harmonized standards, we
> test
> > "worst case configurations" and declare conformity without a competent
> body.
> >
> > Other: Since we do not test all possible permutations of cards and
> positions we
> > must use the technical construction file route and a competent body.
> >
> > Who is right?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David.
> >
> > David Gelfand
> > Regulatory Approvals
> > Memotec Communications Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> >
> > Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> >
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> >      [email protected]
> > with the single line:
> >      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> >
> > For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> >      Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
> >      Dave Heald                [email protected]
> >
> > For policy questions, send mail to:
> >      Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> >      Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> >
> > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> >     http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
> >
> >
> >
>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.rcic.com/      click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"


Reply via email to