Can anyone give me a completive advantage reason for using BT Labs
versus the multitude of other compliance marks. I don't recall ever having a
problem or even a stated preference for them, but got a new sales guys
insisting we have to do it, and at the moment I have no burning desire to
bring another mark, or replace a current one just on a whim.
Not trying to imply they can't do the job or anything like that, I'm
sure they are just fine, just looking to see if its one of the things you
folks in Europe in particular rush off to get done at this particular place.
So even if the answer is no, please give me your opinions. Probably
best to do it directly rather than through the group - although I suppose it
could be of interest.
Thanks
Gary
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
Dave Heald [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
