Dear Kaz, Surely you are not the only one who would love to know this history. Is it possible for you to share it with the rest of us!
Thank you, Tania Grant [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Double Crimp - History Request All, Just a note of thanks to those folks who had responded with double crimp histories from their archives. Much appreciated. Regards, Kaz Gawrzyjal [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Gawrzyjal, Kazimier > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:11 PM > To: 'EMC-PSTC' > Subject: Double Crimp - History Request > > Folks, > > A while back I recall some interesting discussion revolving around the > double crimp requirements of connectors onto conductors. The discussion > held many interesting views in terms of what double crimp means and what > the origins of the requirement were but alas, I can't seem to locate the > threads on the RCIC archives. > > If anyone has a copy of the discussion threads, could someone please > forward it on to me? > > My opinion and not that of my employer. > > Thanks in Advance, > Kaz Gawrzyjal > [email protected] ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
