I certainly have a lot of "small" plastic parts in my products which I
consider to be "exempt" and are not described in any procedure - and they
may well be a lot bigger than your standoff !!
I certainly think your agency is not-picking !!

One point to consider is that I write the procedure for UL and the report
for CSA for my products, and I include what I think should be included, and
exclude what I don't think needs to be there - and if you could work this
way with your agency,(if they will let you), you will save yourself a lot of
grief.

John Crabb, Development Excellence (Product Safety) ,     
NCR  Financial Solutions Group Ltd.,  Kingsway West, Dundee, Scotland. DD2
3XX
E-Mail :[email protected]
Tel: +44 (0)1382-592289  (direct ). Fax +44 (0)1382-622243.   VoicePlus
6-341-2289.



-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Meck [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 20 February 2001 15:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: FLAME RATING OF STANDOFFS



Hi group!

I need a sanity check on a `new approach' our safety agency has recently
taken.

We have an open frame power supply ( has all the certs through the CB report
etc. for EN 60950 UL 1950 )

On of the conditions of acceptability is one mounting standoff shall be
insulated.  We have this supply in no less then 4 listed products without
any reference to the flame rating of the standoff having to be checked when
the inspector comes in.  
I consider that to be reasonable. section 4.4.3.3  UL 1950 has exception:
"gears, cams, belts, bearings and other small parts which would contribute
negligible fuel to a fire;"

Recently new products have been reviewed and the new procedures require
`traceable 94V-2' standoffs!?!?  Which manufacturing engineering says is
difficult to procure a traceable recognized plastic standoff.

Questions:
Has my fever and pneumonia the past weeks clouded my reasoning?  What am I
missing?  You place a .5 inch #6 standoff between a V-0 board and a medal
chassis what requires a recognized part except maybe `straining out the
gnats so we can swallow the camel' somewhere else.

Sick and Tired
Terry J. Meck
Senior Compliance / Test Engineer
Accu-Sort Systems

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to