Brian
I would recommend you get a copy of the standard including the 1999
amendment. It has a lot of good stuff in it including allowing you to chose
the pass/Fail criteria on the immunity testing. Also a lot of the pass
levels have been relaxed compared to the old general ISM Standards
Brian Harlowe
Thermo V.G. Scientific
Tel +44 (0)1342 327211
Fax +44 (0)1342 315074
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian O'Connell
> Sent: 16 February 2001 17:58
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: 61326-1
>
>
> Good people of the group:
>
> Are requirements in IEC61326-1 (EMC for lab instruments) similiar
> to/same/much different than CISPR11/16 and/or the "good stuff" in
> 61000-3-x/-4-x ??
>
> If so, is the "level of difference" enough such that I will have have to
> buy
> (yet) another standard?
>
> thanx much,
> Brian O'Connell
> Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Jim Bacher: [email protected]
> Michael Garretson: [email protected]
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute: [email protected]
>
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Michael Garretson: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
