An excellent elaboration. Norway is not the only place with rocks. Rock really has little to do with the issue. A common equipotential environment is the goal. It's unfortunate we ever started with the terms earthing or grounding. In the US, the code requires this environment be created by common connection of the electrical system, an earth electrode, water pipes, gas pipes, structural metal, sprinkler systems, heating pipes, ventillation ductwork, metal siding, lightning protection (rods), antennas, CATV, telecom protection, and any other structural or piping systems that can potentially be energized. The earthing electrode in the dirt is only one consideration and only comes into play when using electrical appliances outdoors. The alternative (or supplement) to providing this earthed shield or double insulation around the entire electrical system is to use Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters - the term in North America (GFCI or GFI) or Residual Current Devices -the term in Europe (RCD). Note that the RCD or GFI is unrelated to earthing. It simply measure and disconnects electricity going elsewhere than to the appliance and back.

Bob

CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more... wrote:

The relevance or earthing.

Thank you Peter for your so obvious conclusions drawn about
the Netherlands Soil. Our lab resides below sea level (approx 4 meters)
and we do have easy grounding possibilities.

What is the purpose of grounding however. There is no relevance
creating a reliable true earth connection, if the local soil such as in
Norway
would reside on another voltage level. The purpose of ground is creating a means of putting any touchable piece of metal of an electrical apparatus at
a safe voltage level, i.e. the level of it's surrounding such as
water supply pipes, gas and heating metal and the voltage level of
iron in concrete buildings. The local soil would couple it's
CM voltage on every building and pipe, and the only truly safe grounding
level
that creates a safe earth is local soil potential, whatever level it may
reside
compared to (Holland) sea level soil potential.

BTW since few years all new outlets in Holland will be 3-pole: phase, null
and earth,
or in some older cities +phase, -phase and earth.

Regards,

Gert Gremmen, (Ing)

ce-test, qualified testing

===============================================
Web presence http://www.cetest.nl
CE-shop http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm
/-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/
===============================================


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf
Of Pete Perkins
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 6:53 AM
To: PSNet
Subject: Unreliability of earthing/grounding




PSNet,

Unreliability of earthing/grounding

In the PSNet discussion on touch current, a comment was
made regarding
earthing/grounding as it applies to cord connected equipment
using the most
common North American NEMA-15 or EURO 10A plugs types (called
Pluggable Type
A connections in the 60950 family of standards).

The common use of 3-wire earthed/grounded plugs and sockets
is a fairly
recent addition to the wiring codes. This requirement was
generally invoked
around 1960 in North America, West Germany & Austria. From this
it is easy
to understand that this means that yet today there are many
unearthed/ungrounded 2-wire installations.

There is not a lot of worldwide data available, but in the
US Underwriters
Labs has developed a tracking scheme to estimate the relative
proportion of
earthed/grounded to unearthed/ungrounded installations,
especially relating
to domestic dwellings. From their information, around the turn of the
Millennium about ½ of the homes are still 2-wire installations. Added to
this would be a smaller percentage of businesses (since they are
more likely
to get a full electrical remodeling than homes).
Data is not as readily available for other developed
countries or regions,
but something similar seems reasonable.
In the EU, Holland still does not install 3-wire, earthed
sockets in all
locations (although any installation could be easily earthed
locally because
of the soil conditions). Norway, on the other hand, cannot
easily provide a
local earth since the country is built upon a granite rock so earthing is only guaranteed when a specific wire is carried thru the electrical system for that purpose - (which often leads to the derogatory comment that the
Nordic countries are dragging their feet on some changes proposed
to product
standards).
Anecdotal evidence for the developing countries reflects
the fact that
earthing is not reliable because of the inconsistencies of installation
practices.

Because of these conditions, the earthing/grounding is not
reliable and the
loss of earth/ground under these conditions is the normal case,
not a fault.

All of this is compounded by the tremendous expansion of
the use of many
products that were, in the past considered commercial, in the individual home office or small office developed by converting homes to business use.
This not only includes PC's and fax-machines but will also include
workstations, copiers, servers, telephone switches and ATM's (for
delivering
not only cash, but phone cards, phones and other hi-value items) which are
installed rather ubiquitously. In the US, any shop that carries
electrical
supplies also carries a 3-wire to 2-wire adapter - commonly known as a
cheater.

The prudent manufacturer will know that the design of the
equipment should
take this into account - even though this may not be properly
accounted for
in the safety standard that is normally used.

br, Pete

Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety Consultant
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201 fone/fax
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Jim Bacher: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Michael Garretson: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>






-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
    [email protected]
with the single line:
    unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
    Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
    Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
    Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to