"The customer is not always right, but they are always the customer."

Most of the telecommunications providers require NRTL lab certification
because they are not familiar with the other laboratory certification
agencies.  This has to do with risk management. They are afraid of "Garage
Labs." Most carriers are self insured.  Having a product certified and
listed by a NRTL is a "comfort level" to the companies marketing and
management.

Don (Ameritech NEBS representative - Retired)
Don Robert House, SMTS
Product Certification & Regulatory Compliance
Excelsus Technologies, Inc.
2875 Loker Avenue East
Carlsbad, CA 92008-6626  USA
(760) 918-2552 Office/Lab
(760) 476-1519 FAX
URL: http://www.excelsus-tech.com




-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:03 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Product Marking - new twist



As I read this thread, a couple of the postings stick out in my mind.

For instance, one of the messages says that the NEC gives an electrician the
right to unplug an un-NRTL-marked piece of equipment.  Another message
states that the NRTL's mark is the proof of product safety.  

Courtland's original question asked about products that were not NRTL
marked.  I want to follow that a little more.  

His original posting considers a product that is safety tested by a third
party lab.  The product has passed the third party safety certification.
However the lab is not an NRTL.  So the product just says "Conforms to UL
1950" or some similar verbage.

1. Are other certifications from other labs, such as A2LA and/or NVLAP
allowed as long as there is a test report?
2.  Does it matter what the voltage rating of the product is?  
3.  For products with external AC power supplies, would the NRTL mark need
to be on the supply and the product?  Or the supply only?
4.  Does it matter where the product is used? (home, farm, factory ...)

If the answer to the above questions are "No", "No", "Yes" and "No" then,
theoretically, every piece of electronics in use in the United States would
have been NRTL tested and marked.  The tone of the answers in this thread
sounds like this is true.  But I believe it isn't.  Am I whacked here?

Chris Maxwell
Design Engineer
GN Nettest
6 Rhoads Drive, Building 4
Utica,NY 13502
email: [email protected]
phone:  315-266-5128
fax: 315-797-8024




-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              [email protected]
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]

Reply via email to