Hi Jeff and all There are another issue here. When you say industrial could it also be light industrial ?
Remember that Industrial in EU is sites with it's own transformer at the mains. If you are sure that your product is only Industrial just put a statement in the manual that the CE marking is for Industrial locations only. Put the same statement with some more details in your Technical file and I you can sleep well in the future. The only problem is if it is obvious that the product will be used in light industrial locations, then you should make the statement very large and also put it into the marketing brochures. Best regards, Kim Boll Jensen Bolls Raadgivning "Bailey, Jeff" skriver: > Hello group, > > I am in the process of defining a test plan for a product that fits nicely > into the definition of ITE as stated in > 3.1 of EN55022:1998 and therefore into EN55024:1998 as well. My issue is > that although it is obviously ITE > (Industrial network communication hardware) it is also designed for use in > industrial environments not > residential. As hard as I try to justify designing the test plan around > EN61000-6-2 or even EN61326 I still > keep getting pulled back to the definition of ITE and therefore feel that > legally I must test to EN55022 and > EN55024. > > I am seeing this as somewhat of a flaw in the system as I feel my product > should be evaluated to an > "Industrial" set of immunity tests. Does anyone have any pointers on how I > can test the product within the > word of the law while still being able to sleep at night? Must I try to > squeeze more out of the budget in > order to test to the legally required standards and then test again to the > ones that make sense? > > I seem to remember a recent thread on this but of course I did not archive > it... > > Seeking words of enlightenment and thanking in advance. > > Jeff Bailey > Compliance Engineering > SST - A Division of Woodhead Canada > Phone: (519) 725 5136 ext. 363 > Fax: (519) 725 1515 > email: jbai...@mysst.com <mailto:jbai...@mysst.com> > Web: www.mysst.com <http://www.mysst.com> > > All comments contained in the message are my own and do not necessarily > express the views of SST/Woodhead Canada Limited. > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org > Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old > messages are imported into the new server.
<<attachment: kimboll.vcf>>
