Hi All,

I read the standard EN 61000-4-3:1996 with amendments to gather a deeper
understanding of the requirement and the procedure.  It appears the
procedure is at odds with the requirement.  Please allow me to explain.

The requirement is to establish 75% of the field points to be within -0 dB
to +6 dB.  Exploring the uniformity by means of constant field strength
invokes Clause 6.2 a, d, e, f, and h.  I have trouble with clause e.

Paraphrasing for simplicity,

        - take the data
        - find the mean in V/m
        - throw out the worst 25%
        - the remaining points shall lie within +/-3 dB
        - use the lowest of the remaining points as reference.

 The 4th step does not make sense to me.  I can still maintain a -0, +6 dB
spread without invoking a +/- 3 dB window about the median.  

As an illustration, suppose I have data that establishes a spread from -15
dB to +4 dB about the mean.  My worst 4 points are -15, -14, -13, -12 dB.
So these points are clearly further from the mean than +4 dB and are
deleted.  The remaining points are clustered between +1 and  +4 dB.  Step
"e" says the remaining points shall remain within +/- 3 dB, so the point at
+4 dB is considered non-compliant, even though it is only 3 dB away from the
lowest point.  Step "f" says to make the lowest point the reference for -0,
+6 dB.  This being the case, my non-compliant point, originally identified
as +4 dB from the mean is now well within the -0, +6 dB range of the
reference, but is considered non-compliant.

I realize the standard allows up to 3% of points to fall between +6 and +10
dB, but that is not the issue.  This point should not have been identified
as non-compliant in the first place, but clause "e" requires it to be
identified as non-compliant.  

Does anyone know the rationale to clause "e"?   What am I missing?  Are
there any committee members out there who can shed some light on this? 

Kind regards,

Don Umbdenstock
TEPG -- Sensormatic
561 912 6440

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to