Jim Eichner <[email protected]> wrote: >>A philosophical .vs practical question: Why is the FCC doing this? Is it harmonization for the sake of harmonization, or are there real-life issues driving it? If it's the latter, what sorts of products have susceptibility issues between 150kHz and 450kHz? <<
Don't forget that DSL uses frequencies in the 100's of KHz, and for longer lines, the DSL modems -- which will then need to distinguish QAM bits separated by microvolts -- are vulnerable to interference. Cortland ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
