I read in !emc-pstc that Gelfand, David <[email protected]>
wrote (in <DAE684A26044B6469EF0A1E15651168221F83D@semsl131>) about 'EN
55024 / IEC 61000-4 questions', on Fri, 1 Feb 2002:
>Why does EN 55024 call IEC 61000-4-x and not EN 61000-4-x?  Are there any
>significant differences between the IEC and EN 61000-4-x series, regarding
>test methods or limits?

You should ask the CENELEC Central Secretariat why these things continue
to occur. But don't expect an answer.

You will find the 'explanation' in Annex ZA of EN55024, I expect. It's
one of the standards that I have not got.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero.
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to