I read in !emc-pstc that Chris Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote
(in <[email protected]>)
about 'Safety:  Temperature Rise and Capacitor Clearance (EN 60950)', on
Wed, 30 Jan 2002:
>
>I have a couple of questions regarding this standard: (I have the 1992
>version)
>
>First
>
>Table 16 specifies maximum temperature RISE for components, surfaces,...
>What are the assumptions here?  Are they assuming an ambient of room
>temperature (25 deg C)?  Which would mean that a rubber handle could
>become as warm as 25 deg C + 50 deg C which is 85 deg C?  This seems
>high to me.

See 1.4.7 of your *out of date* edition. It's pretty hot but the thermal
conductivity is low, so a burn is unlikely. 
>
>This would be even worse under high temperature ambients.  For instance,
>our products are typically specified to operate in ambients up to 45 deg
>C.  In this ambient temperature, Table 16 would appear to allow an
>absolute temperature of 45 deg C + 50 deg C for an absolute temperature
>of 95 deg C!!!!!   This seems high to me.  Any thoughts?

1.4.7 indicates that you are expected to reduce the rise in such a case.
>
>Second
>
>I am planning on using high voltage hold-up capacitors in a high voltage
>bus application (200VDC).  The capacitors are aluminum electrolytic,
>radial leaded, PCB mount with a safety vent.  Nichicon  The capacitors
>will be the tallest components on a PCB within a metal chassis.  The
>metal cover going over them will be grounded.  Do I need to leave a
>clearance distance over the top of these capacitors for the safety vent
>to operate? Do I need to leave a clearance between their top and the
>grounded cover for dielectric withstand reasons?  If the grounded cover
>is within a few thousandths of an inch of the capacitor tops, do I need
>to put some kind of mylar sheet in between insulate it from the
>capacitors? (assuming that the cover could be bent to touch the
>capacitors.)
>
Well, which way up are the caps? If you put the earthy end at the top,
you don't have an electrical problem. 

BUT you do have a mechanical problem, not regarding safety but
reliability. That cover WILL be pushed in to crush the caps. You need
either more clearance or a pillar taller than the caps to prevent the
lid caving in. THEN you need the Mylar, even if only to avoid spurious
intermittent grounding.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero.
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        [email protected]
     Dave Heald                [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to