I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <OFF94D1E4A.FD295DB [email protected]>) about 'RF Field Uniformity and Antenna location', on Fri, 18 Jan 2002: >4. Our experience has been that position 3, is generally lower in field >strength when compared to other points in the grid. Is this normal?
I believe so. It won't be improved by putting absorber on the floor, either! But you may need absorber to get sufficient uniformity of the field. >We >have tried adjusting the antenna in several different >positions/orientations etc. with not much success. I'm not surprised, but that must be of little help to you. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: [email protected] Dave Heald [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
