I read in !emc-pstc that John Allen <[email protected]> wrote (in <BFE68AB0084CD311B4FB00508B014C8703CF9CD2@MERCURY>) about 'EU DoC - ATEX Examples' on Thu, 7 Nov 2002:
>"The EC declaration of conformity and the application of the CE marking may >be effected either by the manufacturer or his authorised representative, but >not by both. ....." > >Whilst this is ATEX-specific, I think it would appear reasonable to assume >that the Commission takes a similar line with the other CE Marking >directives. Can you think of any justification at all for *banning* 'effecting' by both? It seems not sensible to me. I doubt that they would both WANT to do it, but that is beside the point. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
