With respect to 'alarm systems'  - EN 50130-4 is the applicable technical 
standard.
However, 50130-4 refers to the IEC 1000/EN61000 series specs, 'but with 
modifications'.

Let's take for instance the 1000-4-5 Surge spec that Amund referenced.
In EN 50130-4, the following is stated:

"The test apparatus and procedure shall be as described in 
IEC 1000-4-5 with the following modifications and clarifications
taken into account:"

Then there are two paragraphs - one for Mains and one for I/O lines.
With regard to the length of cables in the I/O lines:
 
"The length of the signal lines between the EUT and to coupling/decoupling
network(s) shall be less than/equal to 2m, "

But the sentence continues with a clarification if there is screened cables:

"however, if it is specified that certain signal lines must only be connected
with screened cables, the in these cases the transients shall be applied to
the screen of a 20m length of screened cable as show in figure 3." 

(Figure 3 is titled : "Typical arrangement for coupling onto screened signal
lines". It shows the test set-up with a 20m dimension between the EUT and
the coupling/decoupling network).

I guess they made that pretty clear in THAT standard.
While a 'typical' installation of my product does not use screened cables of
such lengths, I do make such a length available for the test.

Hope this helps.

John A. Juhasz

GE Interlogix
Fiber Options Div.
Bohemia, NY 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 1:05 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Surge - injection point on screened cable



This is a good example of an inarticulate clause in a standard. One sentence
in clause 7.5 reads "Normally, the maximum length of the specified shielded
cable shall be used. But the following sentence reads "With respect to the
frequency spectrum of the surge 20 m length of the specified shielded cable
shall be used in non-inductively bundled configuration for physical
reasons." Duh! What they heck are they trying to say in that last sentence?
Are we expected to use the maximum length cable specified for the
application but no longer than 20 m? That's seems to be what is being said
in a convoluted way.

Richard Woods
Sensormatic Electronics
Tyco International


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Surge - injection point on screened cable



According to IEC/EN 61000-4-5, the surge pulse shall be injected onto a
screened cable 20 meters from the DUT.

We have a fire alarm system with 20 detectors connected on the same screened
cable, 1.5 meters between each detector. We have been told from the local
test lab that we have to add a 20m cable between each detector in order to
surge test each detector.

I'm sure our local cable distributor like that idea ... , but do we really
have to do this ? Why is this 20 meters cable needed ? Is it to induce the
surge pulse from the screen into the cable lines?

The 20 detectors make a total cable distance of 30 meters and the screen is
continuous. Is it possible to insert a pulse in the beginning of the cable
and test all detectors simultaneous ?

Regards
Amund



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to