Sir 

"Board" level buses, (IIC, etc) are not intended for external use. Note that
the electrical part of these "standards" do not really address EMC issues.
These busses are intended as internal constructions (no permanent external
"port"), logic-level, and are mostly just software protocols.

I personnaly prefer RS422 or 488 if I need to stream data external to my
"box". 

For data port surge suppression issues, look at application notes on the
Maxim, TI, or LT websites for serial I/O ICs. 

good luck 
Brian 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Alex McNeil [ mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:58 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: I2C bus sensitivity to EFT 



Hi Forum, 
Has anyone on this forum worked with I2C products and maybe be able to 
advise on the best method to suppress EFT noise that would alow the I2C bus, 
via external cables, to operate as expected e.g. Good EFT devices? How best 
to shield the I2C? Other? 
As always I look forward to your proffesional advice. 
History 
I have a system that connects 3 products (powered from an in-line external 
non-earthed power supply, SELV) using the I2C bus via a 1m shielded and 1m 
shielded curly cable. I use an I2C bi-directional extender IC P82B715 on one 
of the products. The I2C protocol gets corrupted when I appply the 
Electrical Fast Transient (EFT) Test per the EMC Standard EN61000-4-4. 
I have tried shielded cables, several EFT devices and 1nF caps on the lines 
but with little affect. 

Kind Regards 
Alex McNeil at: 


Reply via email to