I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <846BF526A205F8
4BA2B6045BBF7E9A6A04675B13@flbocexu05>) about 'Draft RoH Directive' on
Tue, 14 Jan 2003:
>Thus, it appears that, unless the draft
>Directive is revised or amended, the maximum allowable concentration values
>of the banned substances are zero parts per million. Am I reading this
>correctly?

I really don't think so. Why don't you suggest zero parts per trillion?
Octillion? 'No limit' means *NO* limit, not *zero* limit.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to