EN and BSI EN are the same, but I would suggest you use EN standards on your DoC, instead of BS EN. The publish date of the standards from EN and BS EN might not be the same, so to avoid confusion, use EN, which the publish date(actually the date is version) are same as those listed in OJ.
>>> <[email protected]> 01/04/03 12:46am >>> Sir What is the rationale given for "some people" not accepting an EN standard issued by BSI? My employer typically buys EN stds from BSI. Is there something different about BSI-printed standards? thanks for info. R/S, Brian O'Connell Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc. From: John Woodgate [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: EN 55103 declaration [email protected]>) about 'EN 55103 declaration' on Fri, 3 Jan 2003: > As a UK manufacturer and European exporter of professional electronic audio > products, we declare conformity with the relevant EMC product family > standards. For testing purposes, we use EN 55103:1996 Parts 1& 2 but our EU > Declaration of conformity states compliance with BS EN 55103:1997 Parts 1 & > 2. As the majority of our products are exported to mainland Europe should we > specify compliance with the EN or BS EN version of the standards? While it is quite reasonable to cite the BS EN, some people may not think so, thus you should cite the EN. This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"
