CONFLICT OF INTEREST NOTICE: 
my employer makes component SMPSs 

A common problem, often perceived as noise, is when the control loop of the
electronic load is operating at a beat frequency of one of the SMPS control
loops. I typically use a quality (X/Y-rated) cap from the load test-power
terminal to the chassis of the load to reduce/eliminate this problem.

If you are doing noise SMPS noise output measurements, valid data can only be
acquired using discrete resistive loads. with a z-match network to the
measuring device. EUT connect hardware is very important.

In general, radiated noise has never been a problem with any load mfr; but I
have had problems with some mfrs that had conducted noise problems at some
combinations of current and voltage. At lease one load mfr tests for
"load-side" conducted emissions by using the load to sink a pure linear power
source. This spec can be difficult to extract from the mfr's documentation.

Load-induced noise, for most name-brand mfrs and for my experience, has not
been significant for testing either linear or SMPSs, WHEN operating within the
rated voltage and current ratings of the load. Remember that the actual "load"
element is a linear device, and linear stuff, when properly designed, is very
quiet. I suppose that "thermal" noise for some components can be significant.
But one should assume a decent load design would take this into
consideration...

An important spec is the compliance V. At low currents, some electronic loads
are not stable when the applied V approaches the rated min input.

Finally, much of an electronic load's noise figure can come from user
configuration; e.g., constant-V vs constant-I mode, external V control
stabilitiy, user connection technique from EUT to load, computer-generated
noise (mostly form cheap GPIB cables), etc.

If the p.s. "swamps" load-induced noise, it's probably time to evaluate the
next p.s. mfr in the queue... 

R/S, 
Brian O'Connell 
Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc. 





we are looking into purchasing a programmable DC electronic load tester for 
evaluating SMPS.  The mainframe unit with one module will provide app. 1200W 
of loading.  Features include constant current and constant resistance 
modes.  Agency claims include CE Class A.  How is this type of equipment 
tested for emissions on the input side?  Having never used such a device, I 
am curious to know if we should be specifying a particular noise figure or 
parameter in our search.  Intuitively, it seems to me there would be some 
small amount of unwanted noise generated by the excitation of the 
representative loading components.  Wouldn't thermally generated noise be 
worth considering, or is this negligible?  Maybe the output noise of most 
SMPS swamps out typical electronic load noise? 


Reply via email to