I read in !emc-pstc that Pettit, Ghery <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'Performance Criterion' on Thu, 24 Apr 2003:
> During the test, degradation of performance is allowed. However, no change > of operating state or stored data is allowed to persist after the test. > Yes, well, as is unfortunately far too common, a CISPR text has been written and accepted with mind not engaged. A product could be failed under that provision if recovery was delayed by 1 NANOSECOND! In other words, what time period is implied by the word 'persist'? We have to guess. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
