I read in !emc-pstc that [email protected] wrote (in <E6F64B42266D6 [email protected]>) about 'another OATS question' on Mon, 23 Jun 2003:
>This method makes a DUT look "hotter" than it really is and makes the site >uncertainty appear larger. Yes, well, for some people that's the Holy Grail. For them, the purpose of testing is to fail products, not to pass them. While their influence has declined in recent years, there are still traces of their earlier achievements. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: [email protected] with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: [email protected] Dave Heald: [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
