Brian -

In using the older standards, the temperature compensation
inequalities are slightly different.  In 1.4.12 of the 60950
standards, if Tmax is specified,

(T - Tamb) ltet (Tmax - Tmra)

or

(T) ltet (Tmax - Tmra + Tamb)


>From 60950-1,

(T) ltet (Tmax + Tamb - Tma).


Other than variable naming, it looks the same to me.  This
ignores the 10ÂșC differential for using thermocouples.


Regards,

Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
[email protected]


> From: Brian O'Connell
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:00 PM
>
> Mr Hughes and Mr Tarver
>
>
> So, assuming I measure a max temperature of less
> than 120 deg ( - measurement uncertainty) in my
> (Class B) isolation transformers, using embedded
> thermocouples, for all rated combinations of
> rated air-flow and power outputs, then the xfmrs
> pass the heating test.
>
> But, using UL60950 3d ed and EN60950:2000, for 50
> deg ambient, the max temp is greater.
>
> Please advise if any errors in my interpretation. thanx.
> luck,
>
> Brian



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to