Thanks for your reply. 

I do not understand why the order of testing affects the basic nature of
measuring and interpreting WV. 

I cannot extract an unambiguous definition of, and measurement requirements
for, WV (aka, U). Table 16, and the clause (57.10) preceding the table refers
to 20.3: "The value of the reference V is as given in Sub-Clause 20.3."

And 20.3 states "The reference voltage (U)...is the voltage to which the
relevant insulation is subjected... 

The top (2) rows of table 16 allows for use of a reference V that is ac,
defined as true rms, or DC. So how do I account for repetitive Vpk that is
significantly higher than the rms or dc (and yes, I have verified my rms
measurements with several instruments using thermal and hi-integration
converters).

Brian 


-----Original Message----- 
From: Mantunes [ mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 8:54 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: IEC 60601-1 Table 16 

Hi Brian 

The reference voltages to clearance and creepage are  the same as the ones
used in the dielectric strenght test of subclause 20 (showed on the second
column of table 16, tests A-a1 to B-e). If the sequence of testing in appendix
C is used, the dielectric strenght tests are made before subclause 59 on
constructional requirements, so you´ll already have the reference voltages
(AC or DC depends on the voltage stressing the insulation being tested). Both
clearance and creepage use the same reference voltage, which is usually the
highst voltage stressing the insulation.

--------- Mensagem Original -------- 
De: "Brian O'Connell" <[email protected]> 
Para: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> 
Assunto: IE C60601-1 table 16 
Data: 13/08/03 22:56 

Good People 
Would someone please provide relevant clause that explains how to use this
table. Are the peak/dc and rms WV used seperately to determine clearance &
creepage, as in 60950?

or is the greater of the dc or ac WV used to determine both crp & clr ? 
Is the same measurement technique for determining WV as in 60950, 1010-1, etc
? 
thanks much 
Brian 


Reply via email to