Hi, Alex - 

"Normally"  actually means "intended use".  That is a relatively complex
combination of what is definitional for the device (eg. something with a
keypad really will be touched by the user...) and what the user will do with
it (eg. if the POS is the size of a deck of cards, it may well go into
someone's pocket; it certainly won't if it is 30 cm by 25 cm!).  You will
soon find a definition for this term in the upcoming IEC 62209 Part 2
standard (Part 1 is in CDV, or voting, stage - these are products of IEC
TC106 WG4).

In general, SAR is applicable for distances less than 20 cm from the body or
body parts; MPE evaluations (measurements and/or calculations) are
applicable for distances exceeding this.  It gets tricky for some devices,
as you indicate.  For example, a  laptop device with its antenna in the
screen would usually be considered to fall under the 20 cm rule - but not
normally if the radiating elements come closer than that, and not if the
thing can radiate with the cover closed (ie be carried while transmitting).


Having said all of that, there have, in the past, been inconsistencies in
the treatment of devices which are in contact with the hand/wrist.  From a
limits perspective, both the ICNRP and IEEE limits do include the
hand/feet/extremities (although the limits are less stringent than for the
torso, limbs, or head).  Exposure in the hand is not the same exclusion of
the hand from head measurements (they have exactly opposite purposes).  Note
that in our experience, SAR in the hand can certainly approach the limits,
and even exceed them.  The "record" is still held by a device which gave a
whopping 6 watts/kg in 10 g!

Ultimately, you must comply with RSS 102 in Canada, FCC OET Bulletin 65,
Supplement C (which is the implementation of the Part 1 and Part 2
requirements - note that an NPRM is out for comment now) in the US, the
R&TTE Directive (via EN 50371 or similar - "soon" it will be 62209 Part 2),
and various others for Japan, Korea, Singapore, etc.  Many of these
standards are in some way derived from or based on the IEEE, IEC and CENELEC
work in this area.  

Note that all of these I will be happy to answer any direct questions with
more detail offline, whether about the standards currently in play or in
development, and of course about your product.  

Regards,
Kate

Kathy M. MacLean
President, APREL Laboratories
Chair, IEC TC106 WG4
Vice-Chair, IEEE SCC 34

-EMC-RF Safety-Antenna Design/Test-SAR/MPE-SAR/Near-Field
Tools-Acoustics-HAC-Wireless- 
51 Spectrum Way, Nepean, Ontario K2R 1E6
(613) 820-2730 fax (613) 820-4161 
cell (613) 791-3777
Web site:  http://www.aprel.com - watch for our new web site coming soon!






From: Alex McNeil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: August 12, 2003 3:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: SAR test applicability, standards?




Hi Forum,
I would very much appreciate help and advice from this forum with regards to
the applicability of SAR, or RF evaluation, certification requirements for
products that can either be handheld or placed on a sales counter e.g. Point
of Sale terminals that are used for financial transactions via credit and
smart cards. These products may contain Bluetooth (2.45GHz ISM band) or GSM
(900/1800MHz)technology. Advice for worldwide usage would be ideal but
Europe and N. America would suffice for now.

Information I have so far is that it depends on how far away from the body
the product is "normally" and the power level of the RF signal? I do not
know at this time what standards would apply?

I look forward to your kind replies.


Kind Regards
Alex McNeil
Principal Engineer



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to