Thanks for the replies.

I'm now happy that an incidental radiator doesn't need Verification.

But now I'm confused as to whether and audio amplifier is an incidental or
unintentional radiator.  As the amp does not intentionally generate energy
over 9kHz (it merely processes it) would it not be an incidental radiator?

Regards

Chris Colgan


From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 01 October 2003 22:05
To: [email protected]; ieee pstc list
Subject: RE: FCC part 15 verification



Richard Woods wrote:

>> An audio amplifier that processes signals over 9 kHz is considered to be
an "unintentional radiator" and must be verifified. <<

I don't believe I've heard of the FCC actually requiring analog audio gear
to be verified, though even a cheap record player with 10 KHz audio does
fall under the definition (uses >9KHz signals) of an unintentional
radiator. What the heck, a _crystal radio_ falls under that definition.

However, here's an interesting look at the REALLY OLD days:

"... we had a two hundred kilowatt Federal arc that was a Poulsen arc
operated on DC, together with a 3300 foot self-supporting steel tower and
an antenna stretched between three towers. In those days we spoke in terms
of meters, but the wavelength in kilocycles was somewhere between fifteen
and twenty kilocycles. If I am correct, I remember we could hear the
similar installation at Panama without rectifying the signal, those of us
who had good hearing. I mean it came out as an audio signal. ..."
http://www.ieee.org/organizations/history_center/oral_histories/transcripts
/stone9.html


Cortland


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to