Isn't it fraud to sell an item that does not meet spec? As
in, the vendor says the product is compliant when it is
not.
Don't all the customers then have a legal recourse to
return any/all product?
Doesn't policing the policy of compliance then become a
"non-governmental" function?
As far as competition, it would not be out of line for the
marketing representative of a compliant company to disuade
potential customers from buying noncompliant products by
pointing out that fraud between the other vendor and this
customer sets a bad tone of a business relationship. One
could stretch this to the point of mentioning "complicity".
<g>
- Robert -
Robert A. Macy, PE .. [email protected]
408 286 3985 . . . .. . . fx 408 297 9121
AJM International Electronics Consultants
101 E San Fernando, Suite 402
San Jose, CA 95112
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
[email protected]
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Ron Pickard: [email protected]
Dave Heald: [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: [email protected]
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
