I read in !emc-pstc that Rich Nute <[email protected]> wrote (in
<[email protected]>) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000' on
Mon, 10 Nov 2003:
>
>
>
>Hi John:
>
>
>>   >Some have questioned whether 61000-3-2 is even an EMC standard! 
>>   
>>   If not, what do you think it is?
>
>I fall into the group that question whether 61000-3-2
>is an EMC -- Electo-Magnetic Compatibility -- standard.
>
>The objective is to prevent reduction of peak voltage
>on the public supply mains (in Europe) due to rectifier 
>and similar non-linear loads.

No, it isn't. Limits are applied to things such as dimmers and CFLs,
which specifically do not flatten the peaks.
>
>The method chosen is to require all loads to be near-
>linear.  

Not at all: the Class A limits allow substantial harmonic currents, and
the Class B limits allow even more.
>
>I suppose this is a compatibility issue -- a compatibility
>between the source and the load.  
>
>And, it is electrical.  

So?
>
>And, one can consider the harmonic content of the current 
>waveform as being an emission from the product.  

Indeed.
>
>But, this is purely a current emission.  It is not measured 
>with a receiver as are the other 61000-series emissions.

The IEC/EN 61000-4-7 instrument can certainly be regarded as a receiver.
There are receivers and receivers: you wouldn't want to listen to the
radio on a CISPR 16-1 instrument.

>Unlike radio-frequency emissions, incompatiblity affects 
>no one but the electricity supplier.  (Don't argue that
>other users on the public supply are affected; this is
>only true if the electricity supplier does nothing at
>his end.)

I'll argue how I choose. Network-level harmonic mitigation is an
exceedingly difficult and costly technique. Harmonics DO affect load
equipment such as motors. 
>
>Non-linear current is not at all similar to the electo-
>magnetic emissions issue addressed by the other standards 
>in the 61000-series.  

One can also argue that sinusoidal radiated emissions are different from
broad-band emissions. So what?
>
>If harmonic currents are an EMC issue, then so, too, is
>x-radiation from cathode-ray tubes -- which is a MUCH 
>closer fit.  Why isn't x-radiation emission included in 
>the 61000-series? 

Because it's covered by other standards, such as 60065.

> Or laser emissions?  

Covered by 60825.

>Both of these are 
>much better fits to the 61000-series than is a non-linear 
>current.

I don't see that they are. Although 'electromagnetic', the difference in
frequencies demands totally different technologies, to deal with the
totally different physical effects.
>
>Lastly, this is a Euro-centric issue, not a world-wide 
>issue.  It shouldn't be in the IEC scheme.

No, it isn't. Several countries, including Japan, are adopting harmonic
emission controls, based on 61000-3-2.
>
>Next thing that will happen is that the 61000-series will
>include requirements against voltage emission (voltage on
>accessible parts) to achieve compatiblity with people to 
>prevent electric shock!  EMC!!!  

No, that is covered by other standards.
>
>:-)
>
>61000-3-2 should be a stand-alone standard.  But, if it
>was a stand-alone standard, there would be no Directive
>behind it to enforce it. 

It replaced IEC/EN 60555-2, which was notified under the EMC Directive
before it was withdrawn. The '61000-' designation is quite irrelevant.

> So, in a self-indulging mode,

Who or what is 'self-indulging'?

>and by stretching the definition of EMC, 61000-3-2 is 
>enforced by the EMC Directive.  That is why it is an
>EMC standard.  
>
I don't think I understand that. And your arguments seem to stem from a
lack of familiarity with the subject anyway.

-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to