I read in !emc-pstc that Jim Ericson <[email protected]> wrote (in
<[email protected]>) about 'EN 61000-3-2:2000'
on Sun, 9 Nov 2003:
>The question about whether the intent of the writers (of EN 
>61000-3-2:2000) was to require a double "repeatability" test for each 
>EUT tested, or whether the intent was simply to demonstrate a "process 
>qualification" has been touched on in this forum for over two years.

I recall only one (your?) article on the subject.
>
>It is now November 2003.  The "presumption of conformity" on the old 
>1995 harmonic emissions standard ends on January 1, 2004.  It is time to 
>finally clarify this for laboratories and manufacturers.

It's actually too late, but we will do our best.
>
>I will communicate with you later this week "off-line", because some of 
>my examples of problem EUT's (and suggestions for clarifications) may 
>breach confidentiality standards if shared with this forum.

OK, feel free to do so. But while I will help as far as possible, YOU
will probably have to do things as well.
>
>However, as a general question, if as you say, "..the committee has not 
>received any request for an official interpretation", then where exactly 
>can we go (as a laboratory) to request such an interpretation? 

You are in the USA, so you should go to the US National Committee. There
is, I suppose, a TAG for IEC SC77A, and it seems to have been very
active. But I don't know where or whether you (in USA) can find the
membership list. I'm fairly sure that people outside USA can't find it.

> A 
>LITERAL interpretation of the "English" language text in the 2000 
>standard means that many of our customers will have a big, big problem 
>on January first, 2004.

I don't agree. My 'literal' interpretation differs form yours, but I
agree that a clarification is necessary. A clarification is almost
always necessary when someone reports a problem of this nature.
>
>I am requesting  your personal involvement to assist in resolving this 
>"repeatability" question.

I will do what I can, but I cannot do everything.
-- 
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk 
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to 
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line.
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to