By measuring the amplitude and angle of the conducted RF, thru the bead, you
can determine the L and R of the bead. An oscilloscope can be used for this
but a VNA is a better method. At any rate, the reduction in radiated energy is
due to the reduction in antenna current flowing on the cables and such and not
so much that the bead "absorbs" the RF. An example is when the number of beads
is doubled. We can use the example of a zero-impedance RF source. The RF
current is halved and the radiated energy is reduced by a factor of four. The
losses in the beads is also reduced by a factor of four. So, we have a
reduction in radiated energy yet the beads are "absorbing" less RF energy
themselves.
 
   Dave Cuthbert
   Micron Technology
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ken Javor
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 7:40 PM
To: Price, Ed; 'Grasso, Charles'; '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: Measuring a ferrite performance 


As usual, Ed's advice is practical and economical to implement.  I would add
the following to make it more comprehensive.  Ed's test measures insertion
loss.  You can calculate impedance from that.

At frequencies where the impedance is high Ed's test works well.  At
frequencies where the impedance is low, it does not provide sufficient
accuracy.  For low impedances, connect a wire from center conductor to ground
with the bead in place around this ground wire.  When the bead adds no
impedance, the wire acts like a short to ground and you see little signal.  As
the bead impedance begins to increase, the short becomes a higher impedance
short and you get more signal at the other end.  Again, from this you can
calculate the bead impedance.

Either of these techniques becomes questionable at frequencies where the bead
acts like an absorber rather than a reflective mismatch.  You will see loss
>from the bead, but I'm not sure it can be related to a specific impedance when
the bead is absorbing the rf.  I think here you might have to carefully
measure current into the wire with and without bead.  The difference would be
vswr-related and again could be used to determine impedance.



From: "Price, Ed" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "Price, Ed" <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:42:53 -0800
To: "'Grasso, Charles'" <[email protected]>,
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Measuring a ferrite performance 






-----Original Message----- 
From: Grasso, Charles [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 9:40 AM 
To: '[email protected]' 
Subject: Measuring a ferrite performance 

Greetings all: 

I have a requirement to test the performance of  ferrite bead (one that 
that can fit over a power cord) to 500MHz for qualification of 
alternate vendors. 

I have an impedance analyzer - but it only goes to 40MHz. Does anyone 
have a good way to verify ferrite impedance.?? 

Thanks 

Best Regards 
Charles Grasso 
Senior Compliance Engineer 
Echostar Communications Corp. 
Tel:  303-706-5467 
Fax: 303-799-6222 
Cell: 303-204-2974 
Email: [email protected];  
Email Alternate: [email protected] 

Chuck: 

Assuming that you have a signal generator and a spectrum analyzer, you could
try the following: 

1. Get a small RF project box. Mount two N or BNC or SMA coax connectors on
opposite walls of the box. Solder a short wire directly from one coax
connector center pin to the other. 

2. Decide on system impedance. If 50 ohms is OK, then just connect a 3 dB
attenuator to each of the coax connectors. If you want another impedance, then
put appropriate resistors (carbon comp preferred) into the project box. 

3. Connect the signal generator to one attenuator, and the spectrum analyzer
to the other. 
4. Now set the generator to 0 dBm and sweep or step the frequency range,
noting the spectrum analyzer response. 
5. Now open the box, break the wire, thread the bead onto the wire, and
re-solder the wire. 
6. Repeat step 4. The amplitude differences will be the insertion loss due to
the bead performance. 
7. Repeat steps 5 & 6 with any other bead samples. 

This isn't an exhaustive test, but it's a good A to B comparison of RF loss. 

Ed 

Ed Price 
[email protected]         WB6WSN 
NARTE Certified EMC Engineer & Technician 
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab 
Cubic Defense Applications 
San Diego, CA  USA 
858-505-2780  (Voice) 
858-505-1583  (Fax) 
Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty 




Reply via email to