This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
I am not sure about your agency review, but I have always used the Telcom
rated fuses from Raychem (TR600-150)and there has never been a problem.
This is based on UL 60950 anex B testing via the flow chart on page 200 and
201.  I believe that refers to compliant PSTN fuse protection devices.
Please keep in mind that the EU and UL versions of 60950 are slightly
different.


Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Hardware Engineer

Escient Division
Digital Networks of North America, Inc.
Suite 200
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

Direct Phone and Fax: (317) 616-6587
Email: [email protected] 
 


From: Alex McNeil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: US Modem Safety




Hi Colleagues,

I intend to use an overcurrent protection device, the Raychem polyswitch
TS250-130, on an analogue modem interface for Europe and the US. I know this
should be OK for Europe but is the 250V rating (ITU lightning protection to
1.5KV) OK for the US? 

Kind Regards
Alex McNeil
Principal Engineer

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all known viruses and appropriate content by
the Messagelabs mail service.


This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Title: RE: US Modem Safety

I am not sure about your agency review, but I have always used the Telcom
rated fuses from Raychem (TR600-150)and there has never been a problem.
This is based on UL 60950 anex B testing via the flow chart on page 200 and
201.  I believe that refers to compliant PSTN fuse protection devices.
Please keep in mind that the EU and UL versions of 60950 are slightly
different.


Daniel J. Pierce
Sr. Hardware Engineer

Escient Division
Digital Networks of North America, Inc.
Suite 200
6325 Digital Way
Indianapolis, IN  46278

Direct Phone and Fax: (317) 616-6587
Email: [email protected]
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex McNeil [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:00 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: US Modem Safety




Hi Colleagues,

I intend to use an overcurrent protection device, the Raychem polyswitch
TS250-130, on an analogue modem interface for Europe and the US. I know this
should be OK for Europe but is the 250V rating (ITU lightning protection to
1.5KV) OK for the US?

Kind Regards
Alex McNeil
Principal Engineer

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all known viruses and appropriate content by
the Messagelabs mail service.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

<<attachment: Dan_Pierce.vcf>>

Reply via email to