lambda/2 pi is only for a tuned dipole-like antenna. 2D^2/lambda is the
proper expression for a high gain aperture antenna, which is definitely what
the original post was about.

> From: "Derek Walton" <[email protected]>
> Organization: L F Research
> Reply-To: "Derek Walton" <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:40:15 -0500
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Near field/far field calculation
> 
> 
> Classically I've used Lambda over two Pi.
> 
> But I guess it's worth considdering that there is near field, transition
> region, and far field.....
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> [email protected] wrote on 4/29/2004, 9:08 AM:
> 
>> 
>> What should our definition of near/far field be? My somewhat arbitrary
>> definition for this case is where the fall-off in the E-field deviates
>> by 1 dB from 20LOG(D/d). A better definition might be some deviation in
>> the 377 ratio of E-to-H. I think I can mimic a dish by properly phasing
>> many dipoles in NEC. Any comments on whether this is a valid method to
>> determine the near/far field?
>> 
>> Dave Cuthbert
>> Micron Technology
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wan Juang Foo [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 12:31 AM
>> To: drcuthbert; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Near field/far field calculation
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dave and all,
>> That is a wire antenna.  The far field is based on a different criteria.
>> 
>> :-)
>> 
>> Tim Foo
>> 
>> [email protected] wrote on  27/04/2004 11:44 PM
>>> I ran a NEC simulation to make some sense of this.
>>> This is too big of a reflector for NEC to handle
>>> so I made a large rhombic. The rhombic is 1
>>> meter by 1/2 meter. The receive antenna is a dipole.
>>> I moved the dipole in from 80 meters 1/2 distance steps. <snip>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------
>> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
>> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
>> 
>> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>> 
>> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>> [email protected]
>> with the single line:
>> unsubscribe emc-pstc
>> 
>> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>> Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
>> Dave Heald:               [email protected]
>> 
>> For policy questions, send mail to:
>> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
>> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
>> 
>> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Derek N. Walton
> L F Research
> Poplar Grove, IL 61065, USA
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
> [email protected]
> with the single line:
> unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
> Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
> Dave Heald:               [email protected]
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
> Richard Nute:           [email protected]
> Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
> 



This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     [email protected]
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to