I also received the e-mail from some marketing firm on UL's behalf. I
haven't taken the survey yet. From the way you explain it, I completely hate
it. However, I would say it appears to be a trend amongst standards
organization to find a per user charge system (i.e. software). I thought I
saw in somebody's fine print (IEC?) that an electronic standard purchase is
only to be viewed by the original purchaser. Are we are getting to the point
where somebody can sue you for loaning a friend/colleague a book you
purchased? Sounds like they want to take away the "book" and create
"software" which has acceptance for a per user charge system.

On one hand I think it is a terrible idea for UL to pitch. On the other
hand, at least they are asking. I hope everyone who gets the survey votes
against it AND they actually listen to the results.

Just my opinion.

Regards,
Bill Bisenius
E.D.& D.




From: Camille Good [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 9:26 PM
To: emc-pstc mailinglist; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Roger
Mccoy
Subject: New UL Standards Policy????


Our company received an e-mail asking our standards
personnel to take an online survey about a new UL
standards policy that they are contemplating.

Simply put, I think the policy they presented in the
survey is a HORRIBLE idea.  Standards could only be
accessed over the internet through a web browser, and
they could not be downloaded to the viewer's computer
nor could they be printed out.

There were a bunch of bells and whistles, such as
interactive tables-of-contents and links to other
referenced standards (but only as long as you had paid
for access to those reference standards too!!!).
There were also some additional questions about how
much more would the service be worth if it also
included access to practical application guidelines
for those standards (no indication of whether you
could print out or save those, but I would assume you
could not . . . ).

But, in my opinion, there is no way any amount of bells-and-whistles could
compensate for the fact that my access to UL standards, which my company has
paid for, can be curtailed by any of a hundred things that I would have no
control over and no warning of.
     Also, there are times when I will be in an
engineering lab or out on the manufacturing floor or
even visiting a customer when I need to have those
standards with me . . . . and the presence of a
functioning computer with high-speed internet access
is not guaranteed!!!

Has anyone else gotten this survey?  Does anyone here
think this is a GOOD idea?  This is the first I have
heard of this new standards delivery method - has
anyone else heard of it?

And - maybe a question that is just as important - are
there any other standards organizations that are
currently using or actively contemplating this method
of delivery???

-Camille Good
Portland, Oregon


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Dave Heald:               [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to