In article <[email protected]
m>, Chris Maxwell <[email protected]> writes

>    I have run a quick test this morning; and I think that Don?s
>    educated guess is right.

I was just about to respond with the same explanation when I saw Don's
message.

>I still have the pack that I discharged
>    yesterday; and I haven?t charged it yet.  I peeled off the plastic
>    ?blister packing? and put
>                              it under load just long enough to measure
>    the voltage on individual cells.  Cell #1 was about .5V and diving,
>    Cell #2 was 1.26, Cell #3 was about .3 and diving, Cell #4 was
>    1.26.    So, it appears that I have two ?duds? in this pack.

At this stage, yes, but read on.
>
>
>
>    Here is the kicker&I bought these packs new and they have never
>    seen a charge rate higher than C/6&even that was just momentary
>    during testing.  This pack has been through two charge/discharge
>    cycles and
>               both charge cycles were conducted by C/10 slow charging.
>      The problem is definitely not fast charging.

No, but you need to do more cycles.*Usually* three is enough, but some
cells need more 'waking up'. If they are no good after five cycles, they
are probably done for.
>
>
>
>    My top three suspects are:
>
>
>
>    1. Slow charging too long?  I let the pack charge at C/10 over the
>       weekend in order to really equalize the
>                                               cells.  The pack never
>       really heated up (I measured about a 6deg C temp rise). But
>       maybe NiMH doesn?t like this kind of treatment.  I know that
>       Lead acid and NiCds love it.

That shouldn't cause a problem if there was little heat.
>
>
>
>    1. Damage from initial discharge cycle?  Maybe I let this pack
>       discharge too deeply during the first discharge test and damaged
>       the cells.

Reverse-charging the two duds may indeed have killed them.
>
>
>
>    1. Maybe I just got a dud pack?  After all, I just bought them from
>       some ?batteries-r-us? website.
>
That's possible too.

In summary, I think explanation 1 is probably correct. (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk


This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Ron Pickard:              [email protected]
     Scott Douglas             [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Richard Nute:           [email protected]
     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

Reply via email to