In our prescreening lab we have a ~9M square metal floor plate that we tie
direct to the Generator when doing IEC61000-4-4, -6 testing etc.
The Generators and coupling devices are bonded high frequency wise to the
plate and are also referenced to safety ground as per the NEC going back to
the transformer earth grounding pad.  In my view that is adequate for these
high energy tests.
the return path of the test signal is back to the plate, and all the gear is
well within the permiter of the plate.
 
However I am getting pressured to add localized ground rods next to the floor
plate.
I do not see how tying this plane to the earth has much EMC meaning unless we
were doing emission uV type measurements.
For that work we have a large GTEM which sits on the plate as well.
I do see that a redundant local ground would violate NEC and that fault or
surge currents would take the parallel path to my redundant ground rods
causing risk to equipment and personel.
 
We are on a hill and have been hit by lightening many times. 
We are also a power lab and are testing 3 phase equipment (480V P:P)
As such I must be mindful of the safety topic perhaps more than others.
If we were to instal an isolation transformer at the room that serviced all
the gear and DUT, then we could establish a local ground that would satisfy
both NEC and EMC type testing but  the cost is an issue that would have to be
rationalized and explained clearly to upper management. ( the transformer
would have to be rather large and the building is leased)
 
Right now I can not support the argument for either local ground rods or the
isolation transformer.
So please help me understand what the rational is for earth grounding locally
the reference plane with ground rods.
Is it like I thought, a uV issue with emission tests or does it actually have
some bearing on high energy EFT, RF conducted type tests?
 
If you can copy my work email that would be helpful.
[email protected]
IT won't let me get the list at work :-(
 
Thanks in advance!
 
Chris Wells
Eaton Electrical
 
---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to