"Haynes, Tim (SELEX) (UK Capability Green)" <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'UK Safety - PUWER', on Tue, 19 Jul 2005:
>If some things are not worth certifying against applicable directives, >how is PUWER complied with? The answer is the usual one to tricky Health and Safety questions - the equipment must simply be safe to use. Certification etc. is an OPTION; the management has a responsibility to provide safe equipment and how it assures itself that the equipment is safe is ALSO its own responsibility. The next slide says 'Do a risk assessment, and document it.' -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Deadlines are 90% of deadliness. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
