Chris,
 
The only other thing I can suggest doing is to trace the GPIB traffic to the
instruments (particularly the signal generator) to determine the sequence of
commands before and during the EUT failure. If you have a National Instruments
GPIB interface, you can run the NI-Spy program and capture the GPIB traffic.
You would use this information, along with the programming section of the
sig-gen manual, to determine which commands are sent to the sig-gen. You
should then be able to re-create the same sequence manually to determine if it
is a specific squence that is causing the failure. However, this may not be
conclusive since the timing of running it manually will not be the same as the
automated sweep.
 
We have an old copy of the Chase CIS9942 software, and it has a problem when
stepping frequency. It will turn off modulation, step to the next frequency,
check forward power, adjust sig-gen up/down if necessary, then turn modulation
back on. It never drops the level until after it takes the forward power
reading, and during that time it may overtest the product. Not usually a
problem, since the level would have to drop more than 5dB for the peak of the
modulation envelope to be less than the previous CW level, but it can happen.
BTW, I have seen a couple of products fail a CW test but pass a modulation
test, even when the peak modulation is 5dB higher than the CW level.
 
Bob Richards, NCT

"Chileshe, Chris" <[email protected]> wrote:

Group,
 
On several occasions during radiated immunity EMC testing, I have observed
products deviate
or even fail and subsequent manual spot checks at the frequencies of interest
have revealed no
anomalous behaviour. 
 
I saw such behaviour on a product I was testing recently, and spent a long
time conducting spot
checks at the frequency and the immediate neighbourhood without much success
replicating 
the failure. I tried turning the modulation on and off and even applying the
modulated field instantly
on and off without much success. I did a sweep again and the deviation was
back like clockwork!
 
What is the explanation for this and there are techniques for getting round
this 'problem'?
 
Rgds
 
- Chris
 

---------------------------------------------------------------- This message
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list.
Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to