In message <[email protected]>, dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Doug Beckwith <[email protected]> writes >Isn't CISPR 16-4 the preferred method? This is what was specified to >us by our accrediting agency.
No. Because the ETSI reference is dated, that is the reference that MUST be used, irrespective of whether there is anything later and/or better. That is why it's necessary to address the fact that there IS no 1998 edition. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immoderately. John Woodgate - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
