In message <[email protected]>, 
dated Thu, 28 Sep 2006, peter merguerian <[email protected]> 
writes
>I have not heard from anyone?
> 
>Peter
>
>peter merguerian <[email protected]> wrote:
>  Dear All,
>   
>  The Japanese RFI standard J55013(H14) is equivalent to
>  CISPR13(1996), Amd. No.1(1998).
>   
>  We have a RFI test report to EN55013:2001 which is equivalent to
>  CISPR13(2001) ,Amd. No.1(2003)
>   
>  Can someone explain the differences between the old  CISPR13(1996)
>  and the more recent CISPR13(2001)? Is there some published material
>  or web link regarding the differences?

Well, you post regularly here, so you probably really know why no-one 
answered. It simply isn't satisfactory to try to explain the differences 
between two editions of a standard, unless the difference is trivial. 
And what is trivial in the context of one product may be far from 
trivial in the context of another.

It may be particularly difficult in the case of CISPR13, because it's a 
very old standard and the structure has degenerated. Bits and pieces 
have been added over the years, so determining the changes between 
editions requires a line-by-line comparison - time consuming! Add to 
that the likelihood that few people here use CISPR 13, which is about 
emissions from consumer products....

I'm afraid you have to buy it. With the recent information posted here 
about low-cost editions published in English by Netherlands, Danish and 
Luxembourgeois standards organizations, it may not be so painful.

Incidentally, your information about Japan may be out-of-date, or soon 
will be. CISPR 13 has been revised yet again:

CISPR 13 (2006-03) Ed. 4.2 Consolidated Edition
Sound and television broadcast receivers and associated equipment - 
Radio disturbance characteristics - Limits and methods of measurement
Maintenance Result Date: 2009

CENELEC hasn't yet adopted this edition, but no doubt soon will.
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Swine wave - a waveform whose spectrum is exceptionally difficult to calculate.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to