Jim,
Let's say the large metal box has a monopole mounted on top. The radiation
pattern is omni-directional and is vertically polarized. The coverage is
uniform and the polarization is the same for each installation.
Now let's say the plastic radio box also has a monopole antenna worked
against a ground plane directly under it. The ground plane can consist of a
metal disk with a diameter of 3 cm or two 3 cm wires (in opposite)
directions can be used. The monopole is mounted vertically with respect to
the floor. This senario will also be omni-directional and vertically
polarized. But if the box is installed such that the monopole is horizontal
then the pattern is no longer omni-directional (referenced to the floor) and
the polarization is horizontal. There will be nulls in the radiation pattern
along the axis of the monopole.
Another senario is if the monopole is used without a ground plane. The
outside of the coaxial cable will now carry antenna current and the antenna
is a long wire of sorts. The performance will vary from installation to
installation.
I can run you some NEC antenna simulations (for free!) of some installations
that you describe and we'll have some numbers and 3-D patterns. This will
allow you to make your decision based on numbers and not quesses.
Dave Cuthbert
Linear Technology
*******************Internet e-mail Confidentiality Footer*******************
This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail
messages attached to it may contain confidential information that is legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible
for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information
contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you
have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify me by
reply e-mail, or by telephone at (719) 593-1579 and destroy
the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in
any manner. Thank you.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Eichner
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 11:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Wi-Fi antenna location
Question for the RF types in the crowd:
Consider 2 scenarios involving a product that uses an 802.11 radio for
remote monitoring. The product is a large metal box, and the radio is a
separate plastic box containing the 802.11 module and its antenna
connector.
Scenario 1: The antenna is mounted on the plastic radio box and the
radio connects to the host via cable and is mounted remotely (several
feet away or more). For the sake of discussion, assume the radio box is
mounted on a non-conductive surface (drywall typically).
Scenario 2: The radio is located inside the host product, and the
antenna is mounted on the metal skin of the host and connects to the
radio via an antenna cable.
Questions:
1. Should one of these scenarios theoretically have better range than
the other?
2. Should one of these scenarios theoretically have less directionality?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Jim Eichner, P.Eng.
Compliance Engineering Manager
Xantrex Technology Inc.
e-mail: [email protected]
web: www.xantrex.com
Any opinions expressed are those of my invisible friend.
Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments,
is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas [email protected]
Mike Cantwell [email protected]
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: [email protected]
David Heald: [email protected]
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
