In message <c1ac11b8.4bf84%[email protected]>, dated Mon, 18 
Dec 2006, Ken Javor <[email protected]> writes
>I am evaluating a PDA-like device for EMI/explosive atmosphere usage. 
>The device has what appears to be an LCD type display, which means it 
>has back-lighting. While the device runs off 4.2 Vdc batteries, which 
>are deemed a safe potential, I expect that the back-light potential is 
>at a much higher level, and that getting from 4.2 Vdc to that higher 
>potential can be potentially noisy from an EMI point-of-view.
>
>Any commentary/experience to share?

Wave a portable AM radio round it. Then you'll know at once if there is 
an EMI issue!
-- 
OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk
Politically unexceptionable seasonal greetings to all.
John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to