In message <DE483FA0DADD1B43B210B558137EAF3A02788E@glkms0009>, dated Wed, 21 Feb 2007, "Hudson, Alan (UK)" <[email protected]> writes:
>The latter is what confuses me - a fixed installation could be there >for 20, 30, even 50, years. So you have to keep the "fixed >installation" documentation forever, but the "apparatus" documentation >for only 10 >years? >Or am I misreading it all (likely!). No, you are not misreading, but I think you are misinterpreting. You have to keep the installation documentation **up-to-date**, but not keep what it was like 50 years ago. What it was like 50 years ago can't affect any EMC matter now. This is not the same as the apparatus documentation, which has to be kept up to date but **retains** all the history. An early version of a product, that is still in use, COULD affect an EMC issue now. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
