All, > If your objective here is to find an alternative to Alocrom 1200 for RoHS > compliance purposes, you might like to consider SurTec 650. We have found > that it compares very favourably. > Look at > http://www.surtec.com/!PIB/6%20Konversionsschichten/Englisch/650E.pdf. > This is a Chrome 3 based passivation finish that seems to perform just as > well as Alocrom 1200 from a corrosion protection perspective.
> Best regards > Neil R. Barker CEng MIET FSEE MIEEE Interesting comment on Alochrom 1200 and thanks for the alternative process. I have a note here from Trimite in the UK (Sheet P/WRGN-1/1 Dec 2004) that says that Alochrom 1200 (amongst others) will comply with the RoHS directive, and goes on to give the reasons. Is there any other information that contradicts this? Regards -- David Want RF Insight Ltd 47 Percival Road * Rugby * Warwickshire * CV22 5JU 01788 541790 Registered in England no. 2601631 at 106-108 Park Road CV21 2QX - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
