Grace,

Include me as a volunteer.

My comments and inputs-

1. We should do both 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz bands. 
2. We should include the wideband data systems. 
3. We should start with 802.11 but also include other 802 standards as data is
collected. As long as we are in a location of information that has 802.11 and
possibly other 802 information, we should include them. No need to retrace our
steps
when we expand the focus.
4. If there are no objections, let's start with, US, EU, China, and Japan. If
others
can assist whenever possible we can add other countries when the information is
available.
5. Using an Excel spreadsheet as described by George Stults looks fine to
start with.
6. For a way to distribute to the members for review, correction, and to post,
we can
ask one of the IEEE emc-pstc admin to place it on the IEEE web page. Regarding
www.wikipedia.org, for postings, is true that anyone change the contents of
items
being placed onto Wiki? If so, would we have the same problem as "incorrect"
information being posted without proper review?

Best regards,

Richard 
2007 PSES Symposium Chair 
2007 PSES Web site: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/symposium/ 
2007 PSES Symposium date: 22-23 October 2007 
===== 
Richard Georgerian
Compliance Engineer
NewsFlex Ltd.
"...turning the world one page at a time..."
Web site: http://newsflex.net
email: [email protected] 
===== 

 

________________________________

From: Grace Lin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 7:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EMC-PSTC] Wordwide Frequencies and Power Levels for 802.11



Dear Members,

 

I am sorry it takes so long to get back to you.
 
I would be more than happy to be the volunteer.  To start with, I need members'
assistance and support to determine the scope.   The subject is "Worldwide
Frequencies and Power Levels for 802.11".  My questions are:

 

1.      Should we focus on frequencies and power levels only?  If yes, should we
focus on the 2.4GHz band only?  Or, should we include the 5.8GHz band? 
2.      Should we focus on the wideband data systems only (spread spectrum 
devices
such as regulated under FCC 15.247)? 
3.      Should we focus on 802.11 only?  Or, should we include any other 
technique
using the same frequencies interested, such as 802.15.4 (zigbee)?  
4.       Which countries should be started with, US, EU, China, Japan, etc.?   I
feel
confident to start with US, EU, and China.  For all other countries, I will
have to
depend on members' input. 
5.      The title row of the Excel spreadsheet suggested by Peter works fine 
for me.
I will need Peter's help to understand the "ISO country code" and how to find
a code
for each country.  I suggest we add a column for information/document sources
(such
as government/document URL links if available).   This would prevent incorrect
information as Neil Barker mentioned. 
6.      We will have to determine a way to distribute to the members for review,
correction, and post.   George Stults mentioned one way to do it.


Please feel free to have your comments on.

Best regards,

Grace Lin

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected]

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           [email protected]
     Mike Cantwell           [email protected]

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             [email protected]
     David Heald:            [email protected]

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to